Feminism is the absolute stupidest ideology in the world

There are many ideologies in the world, all of which teach how society should be. And among these ideologies, if we exclude the dreams of mentally ill persons about how to destroy society and the world, the absolute stupidest is feminism.

To understand where the problem of feminism lies, let's take a simple example. There are hundreds of descriptions of how to best grow a grain crop. How to cultivate, how to fertilize, how to fight weeds, how to grow seeds, how to harvest, how to store, how to organize work and much more. And here, suddenly, a wise person will appear in this list, who will tell us that everything can be done, but the seed does not have to be sown. It is clear that this smart person will be bankrupt next year, but the others will not have thought of such an idea, because how big of an idiot would one have to be to think that it is possible lived without seed and harvest? Logical?

However, processes in society do not take place during the year, and therefore absolutely idiotic ideas do not immediately demonstrate their hopelessness, as is the case with feminism. No matter how stupid an ideology someone offers, no matter what they talk about, even the biggest idiots do not think that children are not needed. If you go to people, offer them some model of the future, you automatically assume that it should be such that people want to live in this model, that this model will develop in the future and that people will want children. It is an area that many ideologies care about, but do not even talk about in practice - logically, children are needed for the survival of the society model. Because - if a woman in your country does not have at least three children, then your country is doomed to destruction. Logical?

But not in feminism. Feminism immediately comes and says that we don't need children. If a feminist tells you that it is not, try to find out her opinion about giving birth before university and when you should have your first children. You will immediately understand that it is so. Yes, there are feminists with three or more children, but - believe me - even among communists and similar ideologies there are people who really want to take care of society, but have not really understood what ideology they are defending or are unable to connect their lifestyle with false ideas.

If anyone questions why feminism is against children - because feminism is not about women's rights, but about the workforce. Listen to feminist slogans and they will always come to work. Whatever Marx may have written, he is absolutely right in one area - with certain profit opportunities, business is ready to break its own neck, and big companies once did this by supporting feminism. The beginning was very good - a lot of new labor, moreover relatively cheap - women were ready to work for less pay than men. As the example of Japan proved, women without children work best and this was also accepted as an ideal. And here is also the reason why businessmen are bad politicians - social processes have to be evaluated far ahead, while businessmen usually look at a period of five to ten years. As a result, there are labor problems in Europe and not only in Europe. A success story turned into a huge problem.

Purely theoretically, feminists cannot be called idiots. Most of them are well-educated, well-paid, in high-paying positions, and I assume most of them are very aware of the consequences of their actions. But, as in ancient Rome: "Let there be a flood after us!" Why not show off when you can show off now and declare that everyone else is guilty for that?

The main problem - as a result, the number of the country's population will decrease dramatically. As an example, we can take Latvia, which loses about two hundred thousand inhabitants every ten years. Even with the best forecasts, in about 60-70 years the territory will have about half a million inhabitants, most of whom will be of retirement age. A similar situation will exist throughout Europe, which means that any other country in the world, where feminism does not have such an influence, will have no problem conquering Europe - they will have potential soldiers, we will not. Well, one can hope that the US will defend such potential cripples, but for how long?

How to get out of this feminism trap? Each country tries differently and here we can already talk about different models. There are no questions about Iran and Afghanistan. Potentially, Islam is what will take over Europe at the end of the 21st century. And no, there won't be any Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates, because these countries currently live on demand for resources that are practically non-existent in Europe. Such an invasion will bring the entire Islamic world to the level of Afghanistan - as we can see, in this model we are experiencing a complete and absolute "victory" of feminism.

The most interesting thing in this story is that in today's "white patriarchy" countries, where terrible white men limit "women's rights" so much, no one physically tries to influence this group of society and save civilization with weapons or aggression. No, the society of each country tries to fight the consequences of feminism in its own way, usually outside the country's official system and ideology, although there are quite a few politicians who still stand for women's rights and emphasize that the survival of civilization is also important.

The most successful model is currently implemented in the United States, the birthplace of modern feminism, which combines several types of action. The first is a successful immigration policy, when illegal immigrants are successfully diluted by highly knowledgeable and intelligent people who come to the United States to study, work in business, or seek political asylum. The second - since the middle of the last century, American men have been looking for wives outside their country in territories where women agree to be wives. By donating the national factor, which is easier for the US to accept because it is a mess of nations from the very beginning, the US keeps the population growing. However, feminism persists and has its own economic reasons, because feminists have managed to get a lot of financial bonuses for themselves, which women do not have.

In Europe, we can divide the richest and poorest countries. In the richest countries, the triumph of feminism began in the middle of the century and as a result governments opened their borders to the people of other countries. Here, too, they are looking for wives outside their country, but the system and openness of the USA is missing. As a result, we got to the desperate situation where we now accept refugees from half the world, but it does not help anything. However, the number of the population is half managed to be preserved, even despite the very poor birth rates, which nevertheless brings the end of the 21st century crash appreciably closer.

In the countries of Eastern Europe, feminism was already relatively strong in Soviet times, but gained strength after the collapse of the USSR. In addition to the fact that many left for the richest countries and Eastern Europe lacks arguments even for attracting migrants, these countries will most likely be the first victims of feminism, because the classic unofficial survival tools do not work, but feminists continue to maintain their politics with the help of feminists from rich countries.

The moral of this story is simple - if national policies continue to support only the workforce, without standing up for women's rights and opportunities, then around the turn of the 21st and 22nd centuries, countries where feminist ideology is central will gradually cease to exist. If anyone sees other options, please let me know.

Well, to tell the truth, there is another option, which feminists are currently implementing covertly, criticizing womans, but they are already implementing it. It is a story about women - incubators. For any ideology to survive, a woman must have at least three children. If there is less, then sooner or later the ideology will cease to exist. Then, another option for feminism to survive is to divide women into right feminists and incubators. The right ones will be those who will have a job, career and political influence - they will be able to travel, earn well and enjoy everything in life. And then there will be women - incubators, who, in order to compensate for the reluctance of the right feminists to give birth and enjoy a good life, will have to give birth to at least six or more children. Well, so that for every right feminist there is at least one woman - an incubator. How they will share and organize it is unknown, but it is the only real way for feminism to survive. The only thing to anyone reading this would like to ask is - would you want to live in a country where such a currently hidden policy of feminism becomes official?

What is most annoying about this story is how desperately feminists do not want such women to live as well as proper feminists. Because, as I said, feminism has nothing to do with women's rights. And yes, this is our future right now. You can change whatever you want in society, but as long as the feminist ideology reproduces itself, the country's chances of survival and development will decrease.

I assume that someone will immediately say - well, if feminism is so bad, why do so many people love and support it? Well, humanity has lived long enough to learn to discard many not very successful versions of development, even though many still believe. For example, communism flourished for about a hundred years until the revelation of its fallacy came, but many still believe. Nazism saw its end in about 20 years, but is now flourishing in China. Theocracy also failed at one time, but flourishes in Islam. And no matter how stupid all these systems were, feminism is the most stupid - even the biggest idiots didn't think they could live without children. No matter how badly people were treated, no matter how they killed, destroyed, crippled society, the idea that the world would be better off without children never entered the head of any of the idiots. Even they didn't stoop that low.

Feminism is currently in its heyday, but there will come a time when normal thinking people will abandon it too, because I somehow believe that society will sooner or later move away from this false teaching back to the issue of women's rights. But anyway, there will be young people who will be fans about it and tell how good it is to live in a country where the workforce only works and does not give birth.