The first step is feminism. The second is Islamization. There will be no third step

I admit that many, many analysts and ordinary readers are surprised that feminists support the Islamic invasion. Because what could there be in common between educated women and those who hate these women? But in reality, both are component of the one target.

Let me remind you right now – feminism has nothing to do with women's rights. Yes, there are women's rights fighters who are noticed wandering into their ranks, but they quickly disappear or switch to the "right direction". Feminism is about labor. In the late 19th and 20th centuries, growing industry needed labor. Women without children showed themselves as ideal workers, and with the support of businessmen, a grand ideology against children arose. Governments passed laws that worsened the situation of women with children, reduced support and created ideological studies that propagated that women should work.

Big problem of feminism

In the middle of the 20th century, businessmen faced two problems at once. The first problem – as a result of feminism, fewer children began to be born and the number of workers began to decrease. The second was related to education – fewer and fewer educated people wanted to work in low-intellectual jobs and industrialists had to start looking for something that could replace the society's IQ of 110 and above with IQ of 70 and below.

An ideological problem also arose – how to distract the already strong feminist movement from the fact that they were being replaced? All due respect to the entrepreneurs who implemented all this with great power. We will talk about the problems with the result at the end, but they succeeded in what they planned.

How to replace feminists? With islam

If in the second half of the 20th century this switch took place at a relatively slow pace, although noticeable in many places, then at the beginning of the 21st century the ideology was turned on at full power. Feminists switched to the defense of the DEI – they managed to use this resource both for ideological support and to distract attention from women's rights in general against the background of the imposed concept of "racism", and to distract attention from the fact that women are now simply being replaced by immigrants, because the old feminist resource is no longer relevant in the labor market. In the middle, there was a very unsuccessful additional attempt to distract attention with LGBT, which will play out in the political sphere for a long time and at the same time closed all this into an even more meaningless triangle - feminists - LGBT - Islam, which still seems illogical to anyone who encounters it. Feminists still manage to push through some mystical arguments about equal wages, but this is currently only against the background of the old run - in the field of law, the representation of the Islamic invasion is already pushing them out of all places.

It's not one man idea

One problem should be noted right away – immigrants with an IQ of 70, for some reason, did not want to work. Rough calculations showed that a relatively small number of immigrants were working and, accordingly, a solution was found – they were needed much, much, much more. Accordingly, feminists had a new task – to advertise and support all this more and more. So our "women's advocates" for some reason began to keep quiet about women in Islam and strongly defend the representatives of the Islamic invasion. As I said – "feminism" has nothing to do with the protection of women's rights. As the right uncles say, so do feminists.

This is also the reason why I say that businessmen make bad politicians. They calculate the benefits in a short period of time and do not try to understand what the consequences of decisions would be. And I am not saying that there is some central figure in this whole process who plans it. Simply, businessmen, by interfering in politics, push the processes in this way and enterprising ladies are already using what they can get. Greta Thunberg will not allow lies.

It end very badly

As I said, both processes have problems. We have already noticed the first problem – so few children were born that from the middle of the 20th century, entrepreneurs began to think about importing labor. Because there was simply no one to work. If you create conditions where women do not give birth to children, but go to work, then after 40 years you simply have no one to work.

I also noted the second one – immigrants do not want to work. As a certain interviewee said – he came for wife, house and money. Give it to him. Not a single feminist who nagged him about this said anything about work. And then the marasmus that many people talk about automatically comes – when "your government" does not have money to support mothers and all the regressives, at every idea that mothers should be supported, whine about where they will get the money, but there is money to support Islamic invaders, where they immediately realize that 9/10 will not work.

There was no third step

Feminism and the fight against children was the first step of businessmen to increase the number of working people. Support for the Islamic invasion is the second step. There will be no third. Islam ends the same everywhere, and the fact that the world pulled them out of the stinking pit into which Islam had sunk itself in the 20th century by joining the global system and agreeing that they are entitled to money for the resources that foreign companies extract does not change the essence. Islam always destroys civilization as such. There is no history, no economics, no education.

There will only be businessmen who will walk away, say that they have nothing to do with it, and try to start over with the first step - spreading feminism in the country where they will be accepted.